RealClearSports
Advertisement

Perry, The Agony of Almost

AP Photo

AUGUSTA, Ga. -- There are a lot of ways to lose the Masters, as Kenny Perry found out on a heartbreaking final Sunday at Augusta National Golf Club.

He led by two shots on the 17th tee, but bogeyed the last two holes to drop into a three-way playoff with Angel Cabrera and Chad Campbell.

On the 10th hole, the second playoff hole, after Campbell had dropped out, Perry drove left into a grove of trees. Actually, those trees are something else. They are the road to the airport. Cabrera closed out his second major championship with ease, and Perry was left shaking his head, and then shaking the winner's hand.

"It's amazing, I guess," he said.

Perry, 48, could have two major titles, but he's won none. He also lost in a playoff at the 1996 PGA Championship at...

Read Full Article »

Recommended Articles

PGA Makes Right Call Bending Rules

Rex Hoggard, Golf Channel - May 11, 2012

For a game that has been guided for centuries by the simple, unwavering tenets of rules we sure have gotten willy-nilly of late, and maybe that’s not a bad thing. On Wednesday PGA Tour commissioner Tim Finchem surprised many... more »

Tiger Is Grinding, Deserves Room to Work

Michael Bamberger, Golf.com - May 12, 2012

The vitriol some of you direct at Tiger Woods is just ... repulsive. Were you rooting for him to miss the cut Friday at the Players? I know you’re out there. You write in all the time. Were you hoping he’d miss ... more »

No Lead Is Safe at Sawgrass

Larry Dorman, PGATour.com - May 12, 2012

When the field is cut to the low 70 scores and ties each Friday on the PGA TOUR, the temptation is to spotlight the leaders while focusing the debate on which one can hang on to, or widen, the lead. But if you're trying on... more »

ESPN Proves Tiger Still No. 1

Art Spander, RealClearSports - May 11, 2012

This headline was on ESPN.com: "Tiger Shoots 74 at Players.'' The subject was Tiger Woods, tied for 100th, and not either of the co-leaders, Ian Poulter or Martin Laird? Why, of course. We're not selling results in journalism,... more »