The NCAA basketball championship is great for fans, schools, and sponsors, but some ask whether it is good for student athletes, with graduation rates dismal at many colleges. Others say players understand the deal and suggest that the NCAA should give up the ‘amateur’ pretense.
Edited by Steve St. Angelo
Ben Miller
Policy analyst at Education Sector, an independent think tank in Washington
This week, 65 teams will begin competing in the NCAA Division I men’s basketball tournament. A billion-dollar, monthlong extravaganza, the tournament showcases the best of college sports—rabid fan bases, historic rivalries, and a format that puts small rural colleges on par with big state powerhouses. But beneath the glam and glitz lies a problem the NCAA would rather leave...
Read Full Article »
Recommended Articles
Dana O'Neil, ESPN - May 16, 2012
And so it can be said that on May 15, 2012, the term mid-major officially became a misnomer.
With the announcement that Virginia Commonwealth has joined Butler as the newest members of the Atlantic 10, the label is now moot.... more »
Mike DeCourcy, Sporting News - May 16, 2012
When the hierarchy of the National Association of Basketball Coaches met recently to discuss whether the NCAA should overturn the graduate transfer rule, they held their discussions in private. Oh, you bet they did. They... more »
Luke Winn, Sports Illustrated - May 15, 2012
Twenty-five seasons have elapsed since college basketball added the three-pointer, and still, there is no consensus on the optimal way to defend it.
Should coaches instruct their defenders to take the three away altogether,... more »