Think picking all the top-seeded teams as the Final Four in your March Madness bracket is your best bet for winning the office pool? Think again.
According to an operations research analysis model developed by Sheldon H. Jacobson, a professor of computer science and the director of the Simulation and Optimization Laboratory at Illinois, you’re better off picking a combination of two top-seeded teams, a No. 2 seed and a No. 3 seed.
“There are patterns that exist in the seeds,” Jacobson says. “As much as we like to believe otherwise, the fact of the matter is that we’ve uncovered a model that captures this pattern. As a result of that, in spite of what we emotionally feel about teams or who’s going to win, the reality is that the numbers trump all of...
Read Full Article »
Recommended Articles
Dana O'Neil, ESPN - May 16, 2012
And so it can be said that on May 15, 2012, the term mid-major officially became a misnomer.
With the announcement that Virginia Commonwealth has joined Butler as the newest members of the Atlantic 10, the label is now moot.... more »
Mike DeCourcy, Sporting News - May 16, 2012
When the hierarchy of the National Association of Basketball Coaches met recently to discuss whether the NCAA should overturn the graduate transfer rule, they held their discussions in private. Oh, you bet they did. They... more »
Luke Winn, Sports Illustrated - May 15, 2012
Twenty-five seasons have elapsed since college basketball added the three-pointer, and still, there is no consensus on the optimal way to defend it.
Should coaches instruct their defenders to take the three away altogether,... more »