RealClearSports
Advertisement

Tiger May Have Come Back to Pack for Good

AP Photo

He’s just another guy, like Bryce Molder or Y.E. Yang or Davis Love III. Shoot, we might as well start calling him Eldrick Yang III.

He might win. He might miss the cut. He never really knows.

Woods latest step into normalcy was a 74 on Thursday at the Players Championship. It left him nine shots behind Ian Poulter, and the most damning part was the complete lack of shock his score registered.

“Just one of those days,” Woods said.

Another one of those days. There have been so many we’ve stopped kidding ourselves. Like we did after Woods won the Arnold Palmer Invitational.

Even Johnny Miller declared Tiger was back. It made sense at the time. Then came the Masters, where Woods finished a career-worst 40th.

“I think that was a...

Read Full Article »

Recommended Articles

Tiger Dismisses His Chorus of Critics

Steve Elling, CBS Sports - May 9, 2012

Used to be, people thought Tiger Woods was the guy who was capable of stopping a speeding bullet and leaping over tall buildings in a single bound. Hey, maybe the worm has turned. On Tuesday, two days before the Players... more »

PGA Makes Right Call Bending Rules

Rex Hoggard, Golf Channel - May 11, 2012

For a game that has been guided for centuries by the simple, unwavering tenets of rules we sure have gotten willy-nilly of late, and maybe that’s not a bad thing. On Wednesday PGA Tour commissioner Tim Finchem surprised... more »

Players Could Provide Clarity to Season

Alan Shipnuck, Golf.com - May 10, 2012

All the silly talk about the Players being the fifth major -- there is no such thing -- obscures its annual importance as a key barometer heading into the summer, when three real major championships will be played in the span... more »

ESPN Proves Tiger Still No. 1

Art Spander, RealClearSports - May 11, 2012

This headline was on ESPN.com: "Tiger Shoots 74 at Players.'' The subject was Tiger Woods, tied for 100th, and not either of the co-leaders, Ian Poulter or Martin Laird? Why, of course. We're not selling results in journalism,... more »