Two wrongs don't make a right.
I couldn't get that tired cliché out of my head Monday as I listened to the nearly constant barrage of opinion from those who thought the NCAA had gone too far, that the organization had unfairly punished not just Penn State but the entire state of Pennsylvania, and had acted recklessly in its decision-making process.
It was stunning, actually, to hear so many commentators question the moral imperative that laid the groundwork for the NCAA's sanctions.
When the decision was announced, I thought support would be nearly unanimous for the tough, downright bold punishment handed down by NCAA President Mark Emmert. But as the day wore on and many derided Emmert as "overreaching" and "grandstanding" or implied that the NCAA...
Read Full Article »
Recommended Articles
Jim Weber, Lost Lettermen - July 11, 2012
I swear I’m not picking on the NCAA.
But no sooner did I get through talking about how broken the NCAA’s Infractions Committee is then USA Today reported the association’s president, Mark Emmert, is on pace to make nearly... more »
Spencer Hall, SB Nation - July 23, 2012
It's amazing how taking down a statue can undo so much. The minute that despised statue of Joe Paterno came down, the event unspooled like the fishing line off a coil. Men who were once children suddenly became unraped; the... more »
Stewart Mandel, Sports Illustrated - July 23, 2012
Children were raped. Lives were destroyed. High-level administrators stood back and enabled the crimes. A once-revered coach betrayed his followers.
But the legacy of the Penn State scandal will no longer be Jerry Sandusky's... more »