There’s always a few sets of brothers kicking around Major League Baseball. The LaRoches back when Andy was able to make a 40-man, the extremely weird Giles brothers a bit before that; the Drews (J.D., Stephen, and Tim), the Aybars (Erick and Willy) and the Izturii (Cesar and Maicer) -- then back through history, the Cansecos, the Ripkens and the Roenickes, the DiMaggios, the Lieters, the Larkins and the Delahantys (there were actually five Delahanty boys in the pros, which is the most in one clutch by my count: Ed, Frank, Jim, Joe, and Tom). And this is hardly an exhaustive list. If you haven’t thought of at least two sets of brothers I’ve omitted already, I question your dedication to this life of useless trivia called baseball.
Read Full Article »Recommended Articles
John Shea, San Francisco Chronicle - November 4, 2012
If recent history is any indication, the Giants will have little or no interest in Josh Hamilton, who's expected to command a long-term contract beyond $100 million.
Since they signed Aaron Rowand for five years and $60 million... more »
Craig Calcaterra, NBC Sports - November 3, 2012
Howard Bryant has an article in ESPN the Magazine about expanded replay and some of its potential worrisome unintended consequences. It’s a good piece, noting the untenable nature of the league’s traditional insistence... more »
Tom Verducci, SI.com - November 7, 2012
his year's free agent class, a function of teams having the money and smarts to buy out some free agent years of their best young players, thus keeping them off the market in their prime.
But the market is rich in choices when... more »
Marty Noble, mlb.com - November 6, 2012
Catchers have a different perspective. Of course they do. They play a position different from all others, not only because they face that-a-way. Their position is about-face ... and stretching the strike zone, strategizing with... more »