This was Dec. 6, when Canceler-in-Chief Gary Bettman and deputy Bill (The Hill) Daly delivered their Angry Men standup routine at a press conference after a group of players had the temerity not to sign on the dotted line even after a handful of owners all but directed them to do so.
Bettman was asked about the possibility the NHLPA might decertify. After suggesting the players were more likely to file a disclaimer of interest, he analyzed the union’s potential legal maneuver as follows:
“We don’t view it in the same way in terms of its impact as apparently the union may,” is what the discredited face of the NHL said.
Well, OK, but then what was the NHL doing rushing to U.S. District Court on Friday afternoon to file a...
Read Full Article »
Recommended Articles
Mark Spector, Sportsnet Magazine - December 14, 2012
It is Gary Bettman’s impossible dream: To create a National Hockey League economy in which Dallas, Florida, Phoenix, Columbus and Anaheim can all be profitable.
Without, of course, shipping containers full of money... more »
Charles P. Pierce, Grantland - December 12, 2012
The owners, who got practically everything they wanted the last time they blew off a season, once again are asking the players to bail them out because (a) they were stupid in the way they sited their franchises, and (b) some of... more »
Greg Wyshynski, Puck Daddy - December 4, 2012
The most frustrating thing about Tuesday's Bettman-less, (Donald) Fehr-less meeting between NHL players and owners is how much common ground the two sides have, yet how far away from a lockout resolution they are.
One assumes... more »
Chip Scoggins, Minneapolis Star Tribune - December 10, 2012
Josh Petzel coaches Pee Wee hockey in the suburbs, plays in four adult leagues, spends a boatload of money on hockey sticks and other equipment every year and has shared Wild season tickets the past five seasons.
The guy... more »
Kevin Allen, USA Today - December 13, 2012
As the misery of the stalemated NHL owner-player negotiations continues, at least we don't have to debate whether a shortened season would be viewed as legitimate.
History decided that for us. There is no asterisk... more »