Novak Djokovic, two matches after being pushed to the limit by Stanislas Wawrinka in a five-set thriller, looked unbeatable in the first Australian Open men’s semifinal on Thursday. He lost just five games and didn’t face a break point against fourth-seeded David Ferrer, winning 6-2, 6-2, 6-1. It was a thoroughly dominating performance, by one measure the most dominant match in a Grand Slam semifinal or final in at least 22 years. But it may not have told us much about his chances of winning this title for the third straight time.
Read Full Article »
Recommended Articles
Simon Briggs, Telegraph - January 23, 2013
It is a sign of the sceptical climate created by Lance Armstrong that when Novak Djokovic came off the court on Tuesday, having confirmed his place in the semi-finals, the questions were less about the smoothness of his ... more »
Christopher Clarey, New York Times - January 20, 2013
The year’s first Grand Slam tennis tournament is already taking a toll, even in a year when the temperature at the Australian Open has rarely spiked to levels that call for a Legionnaire’s cap.
You could see it as... more »
Phil Mushnick, New York Post - January 19, 2013
Quick, name a sport, any sport.
Tennis? Good.
Yup, ESPN does whatever it takes — spends a ton of money, too — to wreck tennis, too.
What ESPN is again doing to the Australian Open is right out of... more »
Courtney Nguyen, Beyond the Baseline - January 18, 2013
Five thoughts from Day 5 of the Australian Open …
1. Maria Sharapova sends a warning shot: She may have completed the career Grand Slam and finished No. 2 in 2012, but somehow Sharapova became the woman on the outside... more »
Christopher Clarey, New York Times - January 21, 2013
It has been nearly 10 years since one of the Williams sisters played another American in the quarterfinals of a Grand Slam tournament.
But Sloane Stephens will get the opportunity to face Serena Williams on Wednesday at the... more »