Forgive me for the delay, but let's just say I needed a few days to cool off.
After all, watching Fernando Rodney pitch from anywhere other than the bullpen can take a lot out of a girl. So I'm glad to say Thursday's game, albeit a loss, was Rodneyless and for that, I'm happy.
You can forget all this nonsense Sean writes about how he's "proud" of him. Bologna. Don't get me wrong, I'm all about passion and drive and yadda, yadda, yadda, but unfortunately passion and drive aren't all you need to throw strikes. Otherwise, Todd Jones would've been a force to be reckoned with in his last years as a Tiger.
But I digress.
I was going to write about how Rodney's three-game suspension, following last Friday night's momentary lapse of common sense, was, well, a bit harsh. Now, I'm not so sure I still feel that same way.
Let's pause for a brief venture into fantasyland...
In my fantasyland, Fernando all-I-do-is-blow-games-Rodney, would get suspended and the entire Tiger's nation would spend three blissful days without worrying about whether "F-Rod" is going to "F-up" and give up two, three, or 15 runs in a game.
I like fantasyland.
Unfortunately, I have to be realistic about this. And Rodney's three-game suspension was nothing short of unfair. All joking aside, he didn't warrant it and doesn't deserve it. And as much as I hate to say it, with October closing in, the Tigers can't afford to lose its closer, Rodney or not. We're in a pennant race, folks. You want your best, and worst, players along for the ride.
I'm definitely not condoning Rodney's behavior Friday night, but let's be honest, he didn't do anything that nine out of 10 baseball players don't do on a daily basis.
Was it inappropriate? Yes. Did it warrant a fine? Maybe. Does he deserve to miss games for it? Absolutely not.
Does anyone actually believe he was trying to hurt anyone when he threw a ball into the stands? I can't see how they would. Just take it for it was. It was Rodney pissed off at himself for his own lack of, well, awesomeness on the mound.
Yes, I said awesomeness. And, yes, I meant it.
What really grinds my gears, however, is that now there's
talk about a letter
written by the Rays beat writer for the St. Petersburg Times, Marc Topkin. According to Tiger's president and general manager Dave Dombrowski this letter
had more pull in the suspension than Rodney's actual actions.
Yeah, that makes sense. Maybe if our friends over at the Detroit Free Press whine enough, we can get other players suspended too when they slide into second to forcefully.
Seriously?
The point is, with no Tiger's
bullpen pitcher being a stable Tiger's bullpen pitcher, losing Rodney for even
three games could be bad for a team who's merely 5.5 games ahead of Minnesota
and a scary six games behind the wild card leading Red Sox.
So, as much as I'd love to take a ride on the fantasyland train, I think I'll stick with the Rodneyville clunker.
I am finally proud of Fernando Rodney.
You heard me right. Fernando Rodney is awesome.
Before you begin your tirade, let me explain me explain something; I have never, ever, ever, ever , EVER been a fan of Rodney. Ever. The proof is here. I have been so overcritical of him that I cannot even claim to not have a bias.
So why I have a made a sudden turnaround in my opinion of him, especially in the midst of such a boneheaded move that he has cost the Tigers three games worth of crooked hat saves?
The reason is simple; passion.
Fernando Rodney came very, very close to blowing a three-run lead that had only occurred an inning early due to some late heroics. What did he do next? He grabbed the ball he had used to almost blow the game and fired it into the stands. Fernando was pissed, and rightfully so.
Was it a good idea to throw a 97 mph fastball into the Tropicana Field bleachers? No. Could he have seriously hurt someone? Of course. Did he act without thinking of the outcome? Yupp. Is acting on emotion and putting it all on the line with basically no time to think about the consequences exactly what a closer should do? Damn right.
For the first time in the history of me watching Fernando Rodney, I felt like he was genuinely consumed with anger. He couldn't believe he had almost cost the Tigers a game. He acted without concern - without consternation. Dare I say, I am proud of him?
Had he hurt someone, it would have been terribly unfortunate. He would have paid severely. But the ball missed everyone. It rattled around the press box and came to rest without injuring a soul. It landed exactly where it should have, which may have been the only time Fernando threw a ball in the right spot all night.
-s
Just a few weeks ago I would have told you that Josh Beckett was the Cy Young front-runner for the 2009 season. A few weeks before that, Roy Halladay would have been my pick. Prior to that, you couldn't have convinced me that anyone was more qualified that Zack Greinke to take home the award.
Now, with the season winding down I have finally allowed Justin Verlander to enter into the finalist category for me.
It's not that I didn't think he was having an outstanding season before this, but I tend to be tougher on Tiger's players. It's as if I hold them to a higher standard simply because they play for my favorite team. I don't ever want to be accused of holding a "fandom" bias when looking objectively at performance. But the numbers don't lie, he is as deserving as any other pitcher.
In my mind, the race has come down to this small group of pitchers: Verlander, CC Sabathia, Josh Beckett, Zack Greinke, Roy Halladay and Felix Hernandez. That's all. An argument could be made for Jeff Niemann, Scott Feldman, Edwin Jackson or Jered Weaver, but they honestly have no shot.
Currently, J.V. is first in wins, first in strikeouts, fourth in ERA, complete games and innings pitched and has been dominant of late. He shut down the Red Sox in a game that could have turned the entire season in the wrong direction had he not been. Without him, the Tigers are looking up at the Twins hoping to catch them.
I cannot stress enough how deserving of the award I believe Zack Greinke is. He leads the league in ERA and is second in strikeouts, while still managing to put up 13 wins for a last-place team. He has been the most impressive pitcher in the American League for much of the year, but he plays for the Royals. As much as this should not be a factor in the voting process, I will more than likely hurt his chances. Taking him out of equation, this leaves us with five pitchers.
Felix Hernandez suffers from lack of exposure. He will get his fair share of votes, but ultimately will be overshadowed by pitchers throwing for larger market teams. He too had been nothing less than spectacular. He will win one someday, just not this year.
Josh Beckett and Roy Halladay have been mysteries to me. At times they have been untouchable, and at times they have looked very pedestrian. Beckett seems to be tiring a bit. The lack of dependability in Boston has probably started to get to him, but his ERA has taken a huge hit, inflating all the way to 3.80. A strong September push could put him back in the conversation, but for now he has fallen to the level of "also-ran."
Halladay has JP Riccardi to thank for his struggles. How could he pitch in such a hostile and uncertain environment? Hell, how could Walter Johnson have pitched in such an environment. He was poised to make a run for his second trophy; sadly his time has passed.
This may be two-horse race down the stretch; Sabathia and Verlander. Isn't it fitting that it is between these two aces? They know a thing or two about battling down the stretch, being former rivals in the AL Central. Now they are going head to head for the most coveted trophy in pitching. CC throws tomorrow and Justin throws Friday.
I'll tell you one thing, I am sure either of them would give up their eligibility in order to guarantee a few more games in October.
-s
Just in case you hadn't heard, Rick Porcello did something special in his young career last night. Sure, he picked up the win, pushing his record to 11-8 on the season. It is also true the he held the big guns in the Tampa Bay lineup - Jason Bartlett, Carl Crawford, Evan Longoria, and Carlos Pena - to a combined 1-15. He even notched five strikeouts, which for him is a pretty decent number. But the truly remarkable thing that the kid did in the Motor City last night was hit the 100 pitch count mark for the first time this season, and the first time in his career. He did so by consistently throwing strikes and challenging a lethal Tampa Bay Rays lineup. It was an impressive win in what has been an overall outstanding rookie campaign. What did Porcello do to celebrate his dominance? Well, I don't know, I wasn't there. But I can tell you what he didn't do. Rick Porcello did not take part in the consumption of an alcoholic beverage, at least not in the clubhouse. And do you want to know why he did not do anything of the sort? Because Rick Porcello is only 20 years old! Yes, this is true. You can expect this from him for as long as he wants to put on a Tigers uniform, and as long as the front office wants to keep him around. Wrap your mind around the fact that Rick Porcello could potentially be pitching in Detroit for 10-15 years to come. Boom goes the mind dynamite. Congratulations on a gutsy performance young lad. Let's hope we see this for many years to come. And while I am (not) on the subject; thank you for making Kevin Youkilis look like a little girl. -s
Time play the "which would you rather have?" game.
In a the bottom of the ninth with the winning run on second, would you rather have Placido Polanco or Miguel Cabrera at the plate? Would you prefer to be really good looking with no money, or very wealthy and quite ugly? Would you rather have syphilis or herpes? Would you rather get hit by a bus or a train?
Would you rather Armando Galarraga or Nate Robertson start for the Tigers on Saturday?
If you haven't already heard, I apologize for being the one to give you such terrible nightmares, but Nate Robertson will toe the rubber for the playoff contending Detroit Tigers on Saturday against the Tampa Bay Rays. Let me repeat that. Nate Robertson and his 7.71 ERA will throw against a highly energized, youthful and powerful Tampa Bay Rays team, that is also searching for a playoff spot.
This is the same Nate Robertson who was demoted from the rotation earlier this year at a time when Dontrelle Willis was still being considered a viable option.
So let me figure this out. Dontrelle Willis is a better option than Nate Robertson, but Nate Robertson is a beter option that Armando Galarraga? Is this a "which would you rather have?" question with no answer? Is it like choosing chicken or fish on an international flight? Are the Tigers doomed either way?
A better and more interesting question may be, however, if Nate gets lit up like one of Jim Leyland's marlboros, could this be the end of the line? Is this the final test? Will Nate Robertson suffer the same fate as Gary Sheffield and be given his release someday soon? Am I rambling and asking a lot of questions out of sheer confusedness at the unfathomable situation I see approaching? You bet.
Stay tuned. You might get to see a free fireworks show at Comerica on Saturday.
-s
Read more at TrumbullandMichigan.com.
Mario Impemba noted in Luke Scott's first at bat tonight that he was riding a five-game hitting streak. That is a fairly pedestrian stat, especially considering what Luke Scott has done against the Tigers this year. So, a five game hitting streak would mean that Luke Scott has gotten a hit in five consecutive games, right? The problem is, Scott didn't play last night.
This is something that has always bothered me. A hitting streak should be just that - a streak. When it is said that someone has hit safely in ten straight games, it should actually mean ten games. It shouldn't mean three games, then a day off, then four more, than a few days off, then three more. Earlier this year Ramon Santiago was riding a hitting streak and every time it was talked about I wanted to scream. The dude only plays every third day if he is lucky. Imagine what Joe Dimaggio could have done had he sat a few games every now and then to stay sharp. Where would his streak be at? Seventy games? Eighty games?
I just think it is such an asinine stat when given leeway.
When a player has a hitting streak going into the end of the year and it carries over the following year, I can see the merit in that. The player has no control over the end of the year, and thus should not be penalized.
But what if Joe Mauer hit in forty straight, and then went on the DL? If he comes back and breaks the record, should that count? What if Luke Scott only played against the Tigers? He would most surely have surpassed Joe D. by now.
Baseball is game that relies so much on statistics and records and such that I feel that if anyone where to break the record without being an everyday player, we may have a controversy on our hands. I know I would most certainly lead the charge.
-s